Daniel Cormier and Jon Jones have a storied history, filled with fierce rivalry and mutual respect. Recently, Cormier expressed his belief that Jon Jones should be considered undefeated in light of recent changes to UFC rules. This opinion stems from Jones’ controversial loss to Matt Hamill in 2009, which occurred when Jones was disqualified for utilizing 12-to-6 elbows—an illegal maneuver under the rules at that time.
Cormier’s Perspective on Jon Jones’ Loss
During a Q&A session in Edmonton, Cormier stated, “Jon Jones should be undefeated. A 12-6 elbow is crazy, but you know, we only can fight under the rules that they give us.” Cormier’s remarks highlight his view that the circumstances surrounding Jones’ disqualification were not reflective of his true fighting ability. The decision by the referee, which Cormier described as misguided, resulted in a blemish on Jones’ otherwise stellar record.
In addition to the disqualification against Hamill, Jones also has a no-contest on his record stemming from a positive test for a banned substance following his victory over Cormier in 2017. While the latter outcome remains unchanged, Cormier advocates for the removal of Jones’ loss to Hamill, especially given the recent legalization of 12-to-6 elbows in the UFC. The rule change occurred at UFC Edmonton, emphasizing how evolving regulations can impact a fighter’s legacy.
The Impact of Revised Rules on Jones’ Record
Cormier and Jones have faced each other in the octagon, with Jones winning their first fight by unanimous decision at UFC 182. Their rivalry has included numerous exchanges of insults and even a public brawl, showcasing the intense emotions both fighters have for one another. Despite this animosity, Cormier has expressed a grudging respect for Jones over the years. He remarked, “We aren’t great and I don’t think that we ever have to [be].”
Looking ahead, Jon Jones is set to defend his UFC heavyweight title against Stipe Miocic at UFC 309 on November 16 in New York. This bout is significant not only because both fighters are regarded as two of the greatest in the sport’s history, but also because it may be the final fight for either competitor. While neither has confirmed retirement plans, the implications of this matchup weigh heavily on fans and analysts alike.
Cormier reflected on Jones’ impressive career, stating, “The amount of champions that Jon Jones has beaten over the course of his career is very impressive.” He acknowledged that Jones has been a dominant force in the UFC, contributing to the sport’s popularity and depth. The loss of such a talent would be felt throughout the MMA community.
In conclusion, as Daniel Cormier advocates for Jon Jones’ undefeated status, it highlights an important discussion about the nature of rules in combat sports and how they can define a fighter’s legacy. With evolving regulations, it’s essential to consider how they impact the perception of a fighter’s career. Jones’ potential retirement would mark the end of an era, but his legacy will undoubtedly continue to spark debates among fans and analysts for years to come.
For more updates on MMA, visit MMAFighting and check out more sports news at Eurasia Sports.
